Management", you're totally WRONG... Here's why 👇…" /> Management", you're totally WRONG... Here's why 👇 They are COMPLEMENTARY. Both are necessary for scaling a company but they're not …" /> Management", you're totally WRONG... Here's why 👇… – Jean-Yves Delmotte" /> Management", you're totally WRONG... Here's why 👇 They are COMPLEMENTARY. Both are necessary for scaling a company but they're not …" /> If you think "Leadership > Management", you're totally WRONG... Here's why 👇… – Jean-Yves Delmotte Management", you're totally WRONG... Here's why 👇…" /> Management", you're totally WRONG... Here's why 👇 They are COMPLEMENTARY. Both are necessary for scaling a company but they're not …" />
Profile picture of Jean-Yves Delmotte
Jean-Yves Delmotte
$38k MRR. $0 raised. 0 employees. • Co-founder @ BuddiesHR.com • 5x SaaS Founder • YC alum • Aspiring Marathon Runner
Follow me
Generated by linktime
April 23, 2024
If you think "Leadership > Management", you're totally WRONG... Here's why 👇 They are COMPLEMENTARY. Both are necessary for scaling a company but they're not the same thing. 1️⃣ Leadership 𝗚𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀 put forth a vision and set lofty goals that inspire others to forge ahead, even when the path isn't always clear. The clarity of their vision keeps everyone focused on the big picture and sustains participation and motivation. Leaders don't have to be managers, but if they aren't, they need to know how to work with and hire managers to build the right teams to execute that vision. It often feels like leaders are asking for just a bit too much, but in the end, that's what provides motivation. 2️⃣ Management 𝗚𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗿𝘀 run teams that do the actual building. Management is all about human-centric execution. Great managers know how to define goals and set operational cadences, all while helping each report have a clear view of their current performance and future career aspirations. Teams with great managers have a high level of trust, experience the challenge and reward of hard work, and feel like they're making progress both as individuals and as a team. Great managers don't initially have to be great leaders, but the more senior a manager becomes, the more important it is that they also develop leadership skills. Eventually, managers need to be able to set a vision and direction for their team or they'll hit a ceiling in their careers. ❓ Which one is better? None is better; you need to adapt depending on the context. Keep in mind that: - Experienced employees mostly need a leader and just a bit of a manager, while less experienced employees mostly need a manager and just a bit of a leader. - Leadership is about driving change, while management is about creating stability. #Management #Leadership #Startup This post is inspired by the amazing book: Scaling People. If you haven't read it yet, I strongly recommend you do so!
Stay updated
Subscribe to receive my future LinkedIn posts in your mailbox.

By clicking "Subscribe", you agree to receive emails from linktime.co.
You can unsubscribe at any time.

April 23, 2024
“Vibe coding” is absolute sh*t. I don’t care what the Twitter threads say. I don’t care how cool that Notion-esque “collab with AI” demo looks. In real life? It’s a train wreck. Let me paint you the masterpiece: You finally hack one dumb feature into place. It barely works. It’s fragile, like Jenga at move 27. So naturally, you think, “Cool, let’s build feature two.” This is where the bomb detonates. Touch literally anything and feature one falls apart. You debug for hours, fix one thing, and now feature two is broken. Smash them together and your codebase is a landfill of duplication, hacks, and accidental copy-paste genius. And we’re not even talking about code quality. Or structure. Or actually understanding what it’s building behind your back. Survive that? You get spaghetti code that looks like it was written by four drunk interns and a golden retriever. GenAI gurus still act like it’s magic. Wrong. Quick check: Would you drive a car if you knew the self-driving software was vibe coded? Would you store your life savings in a bank with vibe-coded backend? Would you get on a plane if you learned “well, the AI did its best with autopilot, but wow, those first two buttons work great”? No. Nobody with survival instincts would. Here’s the reality, today: ↳ Vibe coding ≠ productivity. It's a slot machine. ↳ One feature “working” is pure luck. ↳ Add another? Enjoy the chaos. ↳ Your codebase becomes a museum of bugs and TODOs. Want code with integrity? Consistency? Something actual developers can ship, maintain, and scale? Forget it. Maybe one day these tools can take your napkin doodle and ship Stripe-level systems. Right now? It’s brute force, constant rollback, and praying nothing explodes when you add a second button. That’s why, at BuddiesHR, we still build the hard way. The proper way. Actual engineering discipline. Shipping features that stay shipped. No magic shortcuts. No AI hallucinations. Founders: stop deluding yourselves. You want one “Auto-GPT”-built feature? Maybe. A product? Not this decade. Stay sharp. Write real code. Ship things that last. Or strap in for the vibe-coded rollercoaster. Good luck getting off alive. ---------- 👋 Hey, I'm J.Y! I'm the co-founder of BuddiesHR, the #1 Employee Engagement Software that lives in Slack. I post 1x a day about my journey and share what I've learned along the way. Follow me for more content like this 👆 P.S. I'm writing a no-BS B2B SaaS playbook with everything I've learned. Want a free copy? Click “Visit my website” to sign up.
249 comments
May 26, 2025
VC funding is silently killing startups. Not because venture capital is toxic. Not because founders can't close rounds. But because raising money has replaced solving real problems as the North Star. TechCrunch headlines hype us up daily: ↳ "Startup secures $2M to revolutionize paper clips" ↳ "$5M seed raised to build Netflix for hamsters" Suddenly founders aren't chasing product-market fit. They're chasing term sheets, investor validations, and vanity headlines. Here's exactly what happens next: 1/ Startups pitch investors more than they talk to users. 2/ Teams design slides rather than solve critical pain points. 3/ Companies spend against money they haven't truly earned—burning runway and trust simultaneously. But here's the raw truth no one admits: ↳ Millions raised ≠ product validation. ↳ Buzz doesn't pay salaries. ↳ Most VC-backed startups still implode spectacularly. ↳ Secretly, overfunded founders envy ruthless, profitable bootstrappers. I know exactly WTF I’m saying — because I have "been there, done that": ↳ Got into YC. ↳ Raised a $6M seed. ↳ Lived that TechCrunch dopamine hit. But guess what? Raising doesn’t protect your startup from implosion. It speeds it up. Today, with BuddiesHR, I’m clean as ever: ↳ Bootstrapped. ↳ Profitable at $30K MRR. ↳ Lean. Free. Focused. No toxic cap tables. No investor breathing down my neck. No more chasing vanity metrics like a trained monkey. Founders: Solve real f*cking problems. Stack real revenue. Own every inch of your company. Because raising money isn't the real game. Survival, profitability, and freedom are. Stay lean. Stay focus. Stay bootstrapped. _________________ Enjoyed this post? Drop it a like (👍) — or I'll take it personally. (And follow J.Y for more content like this)
177 comments
April 18, 2025
FanDuel: acquired for $465M. Now worth $20B. Founders got... NOTHING (lol) If you think "that won’t happen to me," you’re not paying attention. Tech Twitter pumps you full of unicorn dreams. VCs sell you “partnership.” But here’s how it really plays out: Founders build a beast. 9-figure revenue, market heat, timing so perfect you can smell the gold rush. But somewhere between all those “raising our next round” PR blasts, they surrender control. Board flips. Investors pile on $550M+ in liquidation preferences. Suddenly, “drag-along rights” means they can unload the whole company… founders be damned. That’s exactly how FanDuel’s founders ended up owning zero from a $465M acquisition. The investors walked with the winnings. The people who built it walked away empty, watching their creation soar to $20B while lawyers fight over the crumbs. You think this is rare? That’s cute. Every month another founder show up, eyes wide, cap table bleeding, shocked that the board cashed out and left them holding air. Here’s the game: ↳ You never really own your company once you lose the board. ↳ Preferences > passion, every single time. ↳ If the people writing checks want out, you’re a passenger, not the driver. At BuddiesHR, we chose our path early. No mystery terms. No board filled with strangers. No upside casino. Founders: Don’t become another FanDuel headline. 1/ Learn the f*cking math. $465M can = $0 for you. 2/ Control your board until it hurts. 3/ You’re not building for a press release — you’re building for freedom. Real game = survive, grow, own your f*cking outcome. _________________ Enjoyed this post? Drop it a like (👍) — or I'll take it personally. (And follow J.Y for more content like this)
88 comments
May 13, 2025